Delaware

DELAWARE SUPREME COURT REVERSES ITSELF: Allows Workers’ Compensation Subrogation of UIM Benefits

The ability of a workers’ compensation carrier to subrogate against and/or seek reimbursement from a recovery made from a third-party tortfeasor responsible for causing the employee’s work-related injuries is universally recognized across the country as a major tool for holding down workers’ compensation premiums for large and small businesses and employers. Whether or not this…

Read more
Dram Shop

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT ELIMINATES COMMON LAW DRAM SHOP ACTIONS: Torres v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., 2023 WL 6801025 (Ariz. 2023)

On October 16, 2023, the Arizona Supreme Court in Torres v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., ruled that the Arizona constitution does not protect common law dram shop actions, and thus, the legislature, by enacting a statutory dram shop claim, eliminated the then-existing common law dram shop cause of action.[1] This means that in order…

Read more
Fuel

Subrogating Contaminated Fuel Claims

Most of us don’t give much thought to contaminated gasoline and the tremendous property damage it can cause to vehicle engines and other equipment. But when an insurance company must pay out tens of thousands of dollars as a result of tainted fuel, all thoughts must immediately turn to subrogation. One question which precedes any…

Read more
Evidence

INDIANA EXPANDS THIRD-PARTY TORT OF SPOLIATION Safeco Ins. Co. of Indiana v. Blue Sky Innovation Group, Inc., 211 N.E.3d 564, 568 (Ind. App. 2023)

Understanding spoliation has become an increasingly integral and important aspect of effective subrogation efforts. Without the necessary evidence and investigation required for a subrogated insurance company to meet its burden of proving the origin and cause of a fire or that a product was defective, subrogation will fail. Spoliation has become one of the most…

Read more
Made Whole

Made Whole Doctrine Class Action Suits and Bad Faith Litigation Continue to Threaten Subrogation Claims

One of the most successful weapons trial lawyers have discovered in combatting subrogation across the country has been the Made Whole Doctrine. It requires an insured to be fully compensated for damages (i.e., to be “made whole”) before the insurer is entitled to recover in subrogation from the at-fault third party tortfeasor. This “equitable” rule…

Read more