When Contracts Block Recovery: Subrogation and New Jersey’s Economic Loss Doctrine

Overview In a decision that underscores the destructive power of the Economic Loss Doctrine in New Jersey, the Appellate Division recently dismissed a property insurer’s subrogation action arising from a construction defect. The case, 1410 Grand Adams, LLC v. Trematore Construction, LLC, 2025 WL 1742859 (N.J. App. Div. 2025), reaffirmed that when losses are purely…

Read more

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Suing Non-Subscriber Employer

Workers’ compensation laws were born from a grand bargain between employers and employees—a trade-off designed to ensure swift, no-fault benefits for injured workers while protecting employers from unpredictable litigation. In exchange for giving up their right to sue, employees gained access to guaranteed medical care and wage replacement. Employers, in turn, assumed the financial burden…

Read more

Turning the Tide on Anti-Subrogation: MWL Shapes Nebraska’s Legislative Response

MWL’s subrogation expertise is not limited to effectively subrogating all lines of insurance for its clients. Recently, our expertise and authority in workers’ compensation subrogation resulted in several Nebraska legislators and a lobbying concern to reach out to MWL and rewrite Nebraska’s workers’ compensation subrogation statutes. Judicial Decisions that Disrupted Nebraska’s Subrogation Balance In recent…

Read more

Vermont’s Landmark Decision on Legal Malpractice Subrogation: What It Means

On March 4, 1791, Vermont joined the Union as the fourteenth state. It has long prided itself on independence, deliberate policymaking, and a certain laconic New England sensibility. But in the world of workers’ compensation subrogation—where uncertainty can mean millions in lost recovery—Vermont’s traditional caution has left subrogation professionals often waiting decades for answers. One…

Read more

The Case for Allowing Subrogation of Nurse Case Management Fees

It is a tenet of modern workers’ compensation practice that expediency and efficiency in returning an injured employee to work benefits everyone involved. Nowhere is this goal met more directly and effectively than in the securing and utilization of nurse case management services. These professionals coordinate and monitor the medical treatment of injured workers, ensuring…

Read more

Breaking Down French v. Amazon: Big Shift in Arkansas Subrogation Law

The Arkansas subrogation landscape is notoriously hostile toward insurance carriers, particularly in the workers’ compensation context. Anchored in a sweeping application of the “Made Whole Doctrine,” Arkansas courts have historically treated subrogated carriers as afterthoughts in the allocation of third-party recovery. However, a recent federal court decision—French v. Amazon.com, Inc.—delivers a long-awaited dose of clarity…

Read more

Iowa Workers’ Comp Pitfalls: Small Errors That Jeopardize Large Liens

On July 23, 2025, the Iowa Court of Appeals gave us a stark reminder that a deceptively intricate statutory framework governs workers’ compensation subrogation in Iowa, and even seasoned litigators can find themselves ensnared by its procedural pitfalls. In Midwest Builders’ Casualty Mutual Co. v. RP Constructors, LLC, 2025 WL 2057804 (Iowa App. 2025), an…

Read more

Defense Counsel’s Ethical Conflicts in Dual Representation in Illinois Workers’ Compensation and Subrogation Matters

In Illinois, workers’ compensation insurers are granted a statutory right of subrogation under Section 5(b) of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act (820 ILCS 305/5(b)). This section allows the carrier to recover amounts paid as compensation from any third-party tortfeasor. Typically, when an injured employee files a third-party lawsuit, the employer or its workers’ compensation carrier…

Read more