The Wisconsin Court of Appeals recently had occasion to address the issue of whether “subjective” and/or “objective” intent to cause injury must be found in the context of an intentional act exclusion. In Fetherstone v. Parks, 2014 WI App. 2, the Court interpreted an American Family insurance policy to determine whether a showing of both…
DetailsThe Wisconsin Supreme Court recently expanded the scope of coverage under auto policies when it held an auto insurer must defend and indemnify a permissive user of the auto who is sued by the named insured. Blasing v. Zurich Amer. Ins. Co., 2014 WI 73, aff’g 2013 WI App 27, 346 Wis.2d 30, 827 N.W.2d…
DetailsOn July 23, 2014, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisers LLC, 2014 WI 86. Remarkably, the decision appears to adopt the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007). According to the minority opinion, the Court adopted Twombly without it having been briefed…
DetailsFor nearly twenty years, the plaintiffs’ bar and negligent third parties have been trying to use the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) as a weapon against legitimate subrogation claims. While the fight continues, two recent federal district court decisions came down in favor of subrogation yet again. Both cases center on a third party’s…
DetailsMatthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C. is proud to announce the addition of two attorneys and two paralegals. We appreciate the continued trust and confidence our clients have shown in our abilities to maximize their subrogation recoveries anywhere within North America. The increased recovery business entrusted to us has necessitated the addition of several experienced legal…
DetailsTexas has historically been a very favorable venue for workers’ compensation subrogation. It has not been without its gray areas. In death cases, when an employee dies and either he and/or his surviving family members have received workers’ compensation benefits, a careful analysis is required in order to determine the subrogation and future credit rights…
DetailsTrial lawyers are already calling it a “travesty of justice” and I gave two media interviews about its significance within two hours of the decision being published. The truth is, however, the new Wisconsin Supreme Court case which is being decried as allowing a workers’ compensation carrier to “force” an employee to accept a settlement…
DetailsGary Wickert’s was interviewed by the Chicago Tribune for an article published on May 14, 2014 entitled “Insurers Sue Chicago-Area Towns In A Bid To Get Flood Money Saying Municipalities Should’ve Done More Against Flooding”. Read the full article HERE.
Gary Wickert’s article entitled “Gathering Pebbles: Subrogation’s Burden of Proof” was published in the American Educational Institute’s (AEI) Spring 2014 Claims Law Update, which can be viewed HERE. Gary will be speaking at this year’s SCLA Claims Education Conference in San Antonio, presenting on Recognizing Subrogation and Third-Party Liability. This conference is presented by AEI…
DetailsEarlier this year, the Arizona Court of Appeals essentially rewrote § 23-1023, Arizona’s workers’ compensation subrogation statute. Prior to its amendment in 2007, this statute provided that the injured employee had only one year after a cause of action accrued to pursue a third-party action. A.R.S. § 23-1023(B). If the employee did not pursue the…
Details