Dram Shop

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT ELIMINATES COMMON LAW DRAM SHOP ACTIONS: Torres v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., 2023 WL 6801025 (Ariz. 2023)

On October 16, 2023, the Arizona Supreme Court in Torres v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., ruled that the Arizona constitution does not protect common law dram shop actions, and thus, the legislature, by enacting a statutory dram shop claim, eliminated the then-existing common law dram shop cause of action.[1] This means that in order…

Evidence

INDIANA EXPANDS THIRD-PARTY TORT OF SPOLIATION Safeco Ins. Co. of Indiana v. Blue Sky Innovation Group, Inc., 211 N.E.3d 564, 568 (Ind. App. 2023)

Understanding spoliation has become an increasingly integral and important aspect of effective subrogation efforts. Without the necessary evidence and investigation required for a subrogated insurance company to meet its burden of proving the origin and cause of a fire or that a product was defective, subrogation will fail. Spoliation has become one of the most…

Made Whole

Made Whole Doctrine Class Action Suits and Bad Faith Litigation Continue to Threaten Subrogation Claims

One of the most successful weapons trial lawyers have discovered in combatting subrogation across the country has been the Made Whole Doctrine. It requires an insured to be fully compensated for damages (i.e., to be “made whole”) before the insurer is entitled to recover in subrogation from the at-fault third party tortfeasor. This “equitable” rule…

Landlord

WHEN LANDLORD’S CARRIER SUBROGATES AGAINST TENANT IN DELAWARE, READ THE LEASE: Donegal Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thangavel, 2023 WL 4605076 (Del. 2023)

Across the country, landlord/property owners’ insurance carriers’ efforts to subrogate against tenants who cause damage to the owners’ property has become a heavily-litigated issue—with mixed results. The ability of a landlord’s property insurer to subrogate against a tenant for property damage caused by the negligence of the tenant depends on which state the loss occurs…

Employer Immunity

STATUTORY EMPLOYER IMMUNITY AND THE TWO-CONTRACT THEORY IN LOUISIANA: Stonetrust Com. Ins. Co. v. TBT Contracting, Inc., 2023 WL 4067496 (La. App. 2023)

In Louisiana, when a company undertakes to execute any work which is a part of its trade, business or occupation, and contracts with any subcontractor for the execution of such work, the company is entitled to the exclusive remedy protection of § 23:1032. The company will be liable to pay workers’ compensation benefits to any such…