The Anatomy Of A Workers’ Compensation Credit Following A Third-Party Recovery: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Harrington, 421 So.3d 660 (Ala. 2025)

Most states permit a workers’ compensation carrier to assert a future credit against benefits otherwise payable when an injured employee recovers damages from a responsible third party. The availability of a future credit is now the rule rather than the exception. Yet, while the existence of the credit is widely accepted, the mechanics of how…

No Free Ride on Future Benefits: Utah Requires Workers’ Compensation Carriers to Pay For The Future Credit They Claim (HB Construction v. Labor Comm’n of Utah, 2026 WL 534446 (Utah 2026))

The Utah Supreme Court has issued an important decision for workers’ compensation and subrogation professionals navigating third-party recoveries and future credits. In HB Construction and/or Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Labor Commission of Utah, the Court resolved a long-standing ambiguity in Utah Code § 34A-2-106(5) and clarified how attorney fees must be allocated when a…

Hope Is Not A Tactic: The Importance Of Interventions In Workers’ Compensation Subrogation

The Eleventh Circuit’s December 22nd decision in Blanchard v. Walker is a timely cautionary tale for workers’ compensation carriers about the high cost of passivity in Alabama third-party litigation.[1] Although the case arose from a multistate fact pattern, its real lesson is procedural and strategic: a carrier’s lien and subrogation recovery depend on the continued…

Connecticut Clarifies Made Whole Risk In Auto Subrogation: Orlando v. Liburd, 2026 WL 41344 (Conn. Jan. 6, 2026)

The ongoing assault against subrogation continues. The Connecticut Supreme Court’s January 6th decision in Orlando v. Liburd, should be treated as a practical warning for carriers and subrogation professionals pursuing automobile physical damage recoveries in Connecticut.[1] It instructs us that, unless the policy expressly and effectively disclaims the Made Whole Doctrine as a limitation on…

The Anatomy Of A Workers’ Compensation Credit Following A Third-Party Recovery: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Harrington, 421 So.3d 660 (Ala. 2025)

Most states permit a workers’ compensation carrier to assert a future credit against benefits otherwise payable when an injured employee recovers damages from a responsible third party. The availability of a future credit is now the rule rather than the exception. Yet, while the existence of the credit is widely accepted, the mechanics of how…

Medicare Set-Asides in the Subro World: A Subrogation Professional’s Guide To Protecting Medicare In Comp, Tort, Med Pay, and Health Claims

Medicare is a federal health insurance program administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that primarily provides coverage to individuals age 65 and older, and also to certain younger individuals with qualifying disabilities and to people with end-stage renal disease. It is generally divided into Part A (hospital insurance), Part B (medical…

California’s Economic Loss Docrine Clarified in Federal Decision: State Farm v. General Electric, Co., 2025 WL 2937533 (C.D. Cal. 2025)

California’s Economic Loss Doctrine (ELD) has long been a source of confusion for subrogation professionals. The challenge is not merely understanding the doctrine’s contours, but applying it to common residential fire losses where a discrete component product damages structures and contents far beyond its own failure point. Until recently, most of the major California decisions…

Staying in the Driver’s Seat: Continuing Your Career as the World Shifts Toward Autonomous Vehicles

About seven years ago, I became fascinated with autonomous vehicles for a very selfish reason: I hated my commute. Three hours a day behind the wheel felt like wasted life. I dreamed of the day when my car would drive itself—when I could answer emails, squeeze in a workout, take a nap, or finally catch…

Why Interventions Matter: The Da Nolt Case And The Growing Problem Of Courts Denying Subrogated Carriers A Seat At The Table

There is a growing and troubling trend in courts across the country: denying subrogated insurance carriers the right to intervene in pending litigation on the theory that the insured’s attorney already “adequately represents” the insurer’s interests. While this assumption may appear superficially convenient, it rarely holds true in practice. Subrogation is complex. Its objectives differ…